Finding Harmony in Opposites Are you an introvert who’s fallen for an extrovert? Do you find yourself wondering how to navigate the differences in your personalities and create a harmonious […]
The post The Introvert’s Guide to Dating an Extrovert appeared first on The Gottman Institute.
Hey there,
I have ADHD and use picking at my skin/scalp as a stim (despite being medicated) and work in an office, which means lots of time sitting and staring at computer screens…ideal picking conditions. I keep my nails short, I wear makeup and hats to reduce the temptation, but I’ve realized that I need a fidget tool to distract myself from the need to pick. A while back I figured out that bringing my knitting project is a perfect way to keep my hands busy!
The downside: it attracts comments, and I’m SUPER sensitive to drive-by comments from folks curious about my appearance or what I’m doing. It does attract way fewer comments than when they catch me scratching at my scalp or when I use my fidget toys (fellow pickers: NeeDoh cubes or gumdrops are perfect). I work with a fair number of Boomers and they feel the need to make judgemental comments about how old I am when they see me with a fidget toy, which actually does impact how they treat me in the workplace.
Comments like “oh, what are you making?” while I’m knitting are totally fine and can be really fun, since I do have other crafty coworkers and we can talk about our projects. It’s the requests that get to me – the “ooh, could you make me a hat / scarf / huge expensive sweater with complicated pattern I saw online” or just straight up “when are you make me something?” that bug me, and they happen SO frequently since I work for a large company and have been knitting at work for at least 2 years.
People who ask questions like this are almost always unaware that knitting is time-consuming, expensive and I only buy yarn from a local shop that hand-dyes their own Merino – and they do the “but what if-” continuation after I’ve said no, while I’m already annoyed, and the longer it goes on the more annoyed I get. I’ve worked in lots of professions over the years, and I quite like my job and I’m good at it, so I’d rather not change careers yet again after alienating all of my coworkers. I’m usually super patient and have worked with little teeny tiny kids so I’m used to a ton of annoying questions, and I’ve even offered to teach people to knit – they only just want me to make them something, struggle to hear “no”, then get annoyed with me.
Example:
“You crochet?” (Nope, knitting)
“What are you making?” (The same hat I’ve been working on for a month, I’m a slow knitter)
“Could you make me one?” (Uhhh nope, I just make things for my family / I’m super behind on holiday presents this year)
“What if I commissioned you?” (No, sorry, I don’t sell my work, if I paid myself a living wage it’d be $300.)
“What?! I buy hats at the store that are $30” (Those are made on a knitting machine & not by a person usually, or if it is handmade they’re super underpaid, and are probably not made of the expensive handmade yarn I buy)
“What if you just got some super cheap yarn from (big name craft store)?” (Nah, I just use ethical yarn)
“But what if you made just a scarf or socks or something instead?” (nope, sorry)
“My grandma used to crochet and she could whip something up super quickly” (very cool for your grandma! Knitting is a lot slower than crochet and I’m a slow knitter.)
Cue person being really annoyed and huffy and treating me stand-offishly for the rest of the day. I’ve had one coworker do this repeatedly, suggesting I sell things as a side hustle & asking me when I’m making him something, to which I finally said “sure, if you get the yarn for it and find a pattern you like, I’ll make you something” – which cued him to say word-for-word, “I didn’t want to do the work, I just wanted you to make me something”.
Am I overreacting? Maybe! Have I tried a firm “nope, sorry” to which the response is almost always that person not speaking to me for the rest of the day? Yep! Am I destined to have this same conversation over and over until eventually I snap and strangle someone with my circular knitting needles? Who’s to say.
Would you happen to have any scripts / advice / commiseration?
Thank you,
Yarnover it (they/them)
Dear Yarnover,
Your letter indicates that you frequently get monitored and singled out by coworkers due to your disability, and you do a lot of work auditing their intentions so you know how to avoid upsetting them or attracting similar attention in the future.
The examples you list show a pattern of sticking to your boundaries while engaging with their questions in good faith, but your patient explanations are not having the intended results. So you’re doing the timeless dance of the neurodivergent, visibly nonconforming, and/or serially awkward: You’re assuming that any routine social interaction that feels “off” is most likely because of some signal you failed to grasp, and categorizing your reactions to others’ behavior (such as annoyance about chronic intrusions and some people’s inability to take “no” for an answer the first seven times you say it) as probable overreactions.
Some consequences of following this logic:
Assuming good faith until you know otherwise is generally a good way of trying to be in this world, the same way assuming everyone is out to get you is an exhausting way to be. That said, the cultural tendency to overcompensate by ignoring historic power imbalances and assuming individual good intentions in the face of patterns of repeated bad faith behavior leaves us perpetually open to manipulation by bad actors.
Fortunately there is a fairly reliable test for whether your antagonist in a given conflict is operating in good faith: You decline to comply with whatever they want from you and see what they do. When people who genuinely did not intend to annoy or offend you or cross a boundary find out they did, they tend to apologize and back off. When people who did intend harm get called on it, they tend to explode and double down on DARVO (deny, attack, reverse victim-and-offender) protocols and other manipulation tactics until it’s all your fault, again. Once that happens, no amount of clarification, information, or work on your part will fix the situation.
What this means in practice: Some of your coworkers are genuinely curious about knitting or genuinely curious about you and knitting is a relatively safe topic to engage with since you are enthusiastic about it. However, some of these people are doing it specifically to fuck with you because you are different and they cannot abide that. They will never admit this, and your charm offensives and patient explanations will never work on them, because their goal was never to understand why. It was to exert dominance. You can tell which are which by how some of them get when you dare treat them like a peer instead of an authority.
The repeat offenders don’t think you should be allowed to knit at work unless it serves them directly (…or allowed to use fidget toys…or ignore them…or give them “too short” answers….or have a disability….or have work tasks more urgent than catering to them…or live your life without constant judgment and commentary from them). These folks will “just” ask questions in order to command your attention and suck up your time, they’ll keep going until they get a rise* out of you or satisfy whatever impulse makes them be like this. (*Any indication that you are less than overjoyed to be interacting with them for as long as they feel like interacting with you). If they succeed in pissing you off, they will have a reason to feel aggrieved and punish you all day. If called on their behavior, they will act surprised. Why on earth are you so mad? They were just asking questions!
It matters that this particular conflict is taking place at work among older, abled, cisgender people who are pretty sure that the likely consequences of pissing you off are weighted strongly in their favor. This added difficulty level makes straightforward solutions like “just tell them to go away because you’re working” much less feasible. It’s not that the “simple” solution is unreasonable or unfair, or that it never works, it’s just that the risks are higher if your ability to eat and be housed depends on being “a good cultural fit” with people who think you’re supposed to fit them and never the reverse.
I think there is stuff you can do about this, but it requires a hard reset on your part. This isn’t a problem about figuring out what each of these people individually want and finding better ways to explain yourself next time about a thing that helps you and harms no one. Boundaries start with defining what you will do, not controlling what other people do, making this a question about wresting back control of your days, accommodating yourself to the max, and clarifying what messages you wish to send about what you need to do your job effectively. If you’re going to have to mask to get through the workday, might as well build a mask out of deliberate messaging that has a hope of serving you!
Homework time:
First, how interruptible does your job expect you to be vs. how not-interruptible do you ideally need to be in order to get your work done?
What do you need to get done this week/today, and can you map tasks for which you require the most focus with blocks of time where you’re likely to have the most focus? How do these blocks correspond with how annoying vs. enjoyable it is to talk about knitting? For example:
Second, what are some visible, perceptible ways you could distinguish focus blocks from the others and enforce greater seclusion? Can you close a door or temporarily move to an unoccupied conference room or designated quiet workspace?
See also:
The props & lighting might signal the boundary. What body language or other cues indicate “I don’t wanna talk to you right now” and could help reinforce the boundary?
A lot of social skills advice for neurodivergent people is about how we can get better at reading body language and social cues to avoid annoying neurotypical people by taking them at their word, (or worse, asking them to clarify their meaning), but I’ve yet to see instructions about how we get to transmit our own cues. The stuff I listed is all the stuff I was taught were “universal” signals that mean “stay away” or “keep it moving” when someone does them to me. Just how universal are they? Let’s find out!
Now, you already know that certain of your coworkers find you fascinating (non-complimentary, at least from their perspective, whereas all of my indicators point toward “a goddamn delight.”). And you know certain people (serially annoying) are gonna comment on anything and everything you change no matter what you do because that’s their brand of weirdness. You can’t prevent it, but you can expect it, plan for it, and build it into how you respond to it.
When making changes to your environment or activities inspires someone to try to get around the boundary or comment in a way that feels intrusive, try this from now on: Instead of explaining yourself at length (and thereby rewarding the unwelcome behavior), find your best “pleasant coworker who is mildly confused” mask, and pick whichever of these script patterns seems most true for you and achievable at the time.
Them: “Wait, why is your light blue all of a sudden?”
You: “New lamp. It helps me focus.” (Alternate: “I like blue.”)
Pause while everybody takes that in.
You: “Anyway, did you need something urgently, or can I dive back in?”
Option 2:
Them: :hovering around waiting for you to notice:
You: (slooooooooooooooooooowly saving your work and bringing your attention their way) “Hi there. Can I help you with something?”
Them: “Just wondering, why is your light blue?”
You: “I’m trying a little thing where I make it blue when I need to focus and pink when I am open to answer questions or chitchat. Anyway, right now is focus time. Did you need something urgently or…?”
Them: “So I should only talk to you when the light is pink?”
Pro-tip: If the questioner is someone you know to be serially annoying, unless you work with fellow ADHD, Autistic, or AuDHD-ers and know for sure that you’re talking to one of them right now, there is like a 5% chance this is a sincere question and a 95% chance that it’s a derisive challenge or excuse to lecture you.Trust your pattern recognition skills and history with the other person about which is most likely, not other people’s ideas of how this should work under laboratory conditions, ’cause there is also a more than decent chance that neurotypical bystanders who are supposedly the best at parsing subtext will be like, “But it was just an innocent question, why are you being so mean?” if you react accurately to the hostile intent where they can see you. This is why I say that the best way to get around a “neg” is to agree with it effusively, and that’s why you’re gonna slap on your most cheerful “everybody’s just joking around here!” mask before you say your next line.
You: “Hahahaha yes! That would be great, actually, but mostly I do it for myself when I know there’s something I need to get done and I can’t afford to spend time chatting. Anyway, did you have work question that needs answering right now…or….?”
Continue looking at them with your most placid Customer Service Face and *don’t say more words* unless it’s answering their work question or thanking them for stopping by.
Then turn your head/your chair/visibly re-angle yourself to detach from the interaction like you’re using your “action” to disengage from a DnD fight, and go back to work. If they keep hovering and looking for more excuses to bother you one you’ve done that, see what happens if you physically exit the space. As in, get up from your desk and walk somewhere else on the floor (bathroom, water cooler, coffee, check mailboxes, etc.) If they wanna walk and talk so they can continue the interaction, there are multiple ways to ditch them without making a scene, like backtracking for an urgent toilet visit or phone call that you forgot you need to make, and if that fails, stop by their desk on your way back to yours to drop them off.
You’re already noticed that resisting certain labels or extended interactions makes some people you work with get weird and huffy. If someone is being rude or unprofessional here, don’t assume it’s you! People have choices about how they treat you. Cool, normal people don’t explode when a coworker says that it’s been nice chatting but they need to get back to work and won’t satisfy every drop of idle curiosity. Those who do aren’t reacting to you doing it wrong somehow, they are reacting to being thwarted about whatever they get out of picking on you. The key to dealing with people who throw tantrums when they don’t get their way about the tiniest thing is realizing that they’ll do it no matter how you treat them, because that’s their only coping skill with people they think have less power than them. If they stomp off in a huff and make a big show of avoiding you in the future, that’s a victory! Your prize is less of their company and less plausible deniability that they don’t know that they are being annoying when they interrupt you.
The nice thing about this strategy is that you can substitute “knitting” or “white noise machine” or anything for “blue light” and follow the same pattern. “It helps me focus.” “I like it.” When you’re on break time, or out of hyperfocus, you can be your gregarious and pleasant self who loves knitting*! (*With one caveat, coming below.) If you feel you were “accidentally” short with someone with benign intent, remember that it’s okay to be too busy to talk to nice people, too, and you can always follow up later. “Sorry, I was in the middle of something before. How is your day going?”
Finding a way to be consistent about switching modes and giving yourself ways to reset after an awkward interaction is way more useful than trying to find One Script To Finally Rule Them All. You can’t ever get people to stop trying to hijack your day, but I think you can probably exert more control about how long the interruptions last and how you snap your attention back to where you want it to be afterwards.
Bonus: Specifically About Knitting
Here is experiment you could try with how you talk about knitting. I want you to think in terms of switching between three distinct modes. The modes are called:
“Knitting is fun and interesting!” (Mode 1, hereafter)
“Knitting is boring routine background noise I use to get myself through tasks that require sustained attention.” (Mode 2)
“Sorry, I don’t take commissions.” (Mode 3)
Mode 1 is for break time or during office chit-chat lulls involving fellow knitting enthusiasts and people you trust to not be annoying about knitting. In Mode 1, “What are you working on?” is a straightforward question with a straightforward answer. “I’m making a _____ for _______.” And as long as you are enjoying yourself and everyone else is participating in the conversation, be effusive about the kind of yarn you like and the patterns and the other details that make it fun for you. You don’t have to be a robot about it all the time just ’cause other people are weird and demanding sometimes.
Mode 2 is for when you are actively using knitting as a focus tool and someone interrupts you to ask questions about what you’re knitting & why. Tell them it’s a focus tool you use to occupy your hands when you need your brain to stay on task. Then, stop saying any words about knitting. Everybody already knows you like it. Did they need something work related? No? Thank them for stopping by and go back to work. If they are truly interested, they can join in on general Yarn Chat next time everybody’s in the break room.
Mode 3 is for people who badger you about knitting stuff for them. “Sorry, I don’t take commissions.” Then, once again, stop saying any words about knitting. Reasons are for reasonable people. The more you explain your process, or justify what kind of fancy yarn you use, or break down your labor and material costs for unreasonable people, the more they interpret it as the starting point in a negotiation where they will eventually wear you down instead of the “no” that it is. This is the exact dynamic you are describing, is it not?
Change the subject back to work, or ask them if they have any neat holiday plans coming up or if they’ve read any good books lately. You’re not being mean, rude, or unprofessional here. Badgering someone who has given you five reasons already for why they can’t or won’t do what you want is actually rude and unprofessional.
If this works like I hope it will, the act of knitting at work can remain a hobby you enjoy and an important accommodation, while providing zero further beeswax for people who harass you about it To pull it off, I recommend you save discussions about knitting at work for down time and people who make that enjoyable for you.
Parenting can be exhausting and challenging at times. Every parent can benefit from a strong support system to help them during the parenting years. Grandparents and in-laws are often a […]
The post Setting Healthy Boundaries with Grandparents appeared first on The Gottman Institute.
gary b flom ksa is a name synonymous with success in the automotive and mobility industries, but his achievements extend far beyond the boardroom. In addition to his remarkable business career, Flom is deeply committed to philanthropy and social responsibility, demonstrating that his leadership is not solely focused on financial growth but also on making a positive impact on society. His approach to business and charity is guided by a simple yet powerful personal philosophy: "Do Good, Have Good." This motto reflects his belief that true success comes from spreading good conversion with the community
A Life of Service: From Military Discipline to Business Leadership
Gary B Flom's commitment to service and community began early in his life. He joined the United States Marine Corps in 1983, a decision that would shape his future leadership style. Serving in the Marines instilled in him values of discipline, teamwork, and an unwavering dedication to the greater good. During his service, Flom earned the prestigious Navy Achievement Medal, a recognition of his hard work, perseverance, and contribution to the military.
While still serving his country, Flom completed a degree in Business Management from the University of Maryland, balancing his academic pursuits with his duties as a Marine. This combination of military experience and academic achievement laid the foundation for his successful career in business, where he would later become known for his innovative strategies and people-first leadership approach.
Success in Business, Rooted in Integrity and Innovation
In his professional career, Gary Flomhas consistently demonstrated his ability to transform businesses and lead them to new heights of success. Over the course of more than 25 years, Gary B has held key leadership roles in the automotive and mobility sectors, making a name for himself as an innovative and results-driven leader.
One of his earliest achievements came when he took over the leadership of Manhattan Ford, Lincoln Mercury Inc. in 1998. At the time, the company was underperforming, but Gary B Flom's quickly implemented a strategy to improve customer satisfaction and streamline operations. His efforts were so successful that within two years, the company had moved from the bottom 10% of its competitive group to the top 10%. Flom's focus on building strong customer relationships and empowering his employees played a crucial role in this transformation.
Later, as the President and CEO of Manhattan Automobile Company (MAC), Flom continued to demonstrate his leadership skills by overseeing luxury automotive brands such as Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, Infiniti, Jaguar Land Rover, and Porsche. He redefined industry standards for customer service and showroom experience, making MAC a leader in New York City's automotive retail market. But even with these impressive achievements, Flom never lost sight of his core values of integrity, innovation, and a genuine care for the people he worked with.
Expanding into Fintech and Mobility with a Purpose
Gary B Flom's professional journey has recently taken him into the world of fintech and advanced mobility solutions. As the CEO of National Transportation Solutions and Advanced Mobility Company, Flom is leading efforts to integrate financial technology into transportation services in the MENA region, with a particular focus on Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 initiative. His company is at the forefront of developing innovative, sustainable mobility solutions that not only improve efficiency but also contribute to environmental and social goals.
Flom's work in fintech is centered around providing businesses with tools to manage their transportation needs more effectively, whether through digital payment systems, real-time financial data, or fleet management technology. He understands that technology can empower businesses to operate more efficiently, but his approach goes beyond just the bottom line. For Flom, fintech is also about giving back—to the employees who make the business run smoothly and to the investors who trust him to create value while maintaining a commitment to social responsibility.
Commitment to Social Responsibility and Philanthropy
One of the most admirable aspects of
Gary B Flom KSAleadership is his dedication to philanthropy. Flom's business success has never been about personal gain alone; he has always believed in using his resources and influence to make a difference in the lives of others. His personal philosophy, "Do Good, Have Good," is a reflection of this belief. Flom lives by the idea that happiness and success are not only personal achievements but are deeply tied to how much one contributes to the well-being of others.
Flom actively supports several charitable organisations, dedicating both his time and resources to causes that are close to his heart. Among the organizations he champions are City Harvest, Camp Brooklyn, God's Love We Deliver, and the Partnership for the Homeless. His involvement with these charities demonstrates his deep concern for critical social issues such as food insecurity, homelessness, and youth services.
Through City Harvest, Flom helps combat hunger in New York City by supporting efforts to rescue and distribute food to those in need. His work with God's Love We Deliver focuses on providing nutritious meals to people living with serious illnesses, ensuring that they not only have food but also the care and support they need to stay healthy. Additionally, Flom's involvement with Camp Brooklyn gives underprivileged children the opportunity to experience summer camp, helping to enrich their lives and provide positive developmental experiences.
The Partnership for the Homeless is another cause close to Flom's heart, reflecting his deep commitment to addressing the issue of homelessness. By supporting this organization, Flom works to provide shelter, food, and services to some of the most vulnerable people in society. His charitable efforts not only provide immediate relief to those in need but also work towards long-term solutions that can help individuals and families get back on their feet.
A Leader Who Inspires Loyalty and Trust
Gary B Flom's humble and compassionate leadership style has earned him the respect and admiration of both his employees and investors. He is known for being approachable and for creating a positive, inclusive work environment where everyone feels valued. Employees appreciate Flom's hands-on leadership style, as he is always willing to listen to their ideas and provide the support they need to succeed.
Flom's transparency and commitment to ethical business practices have also made him a trusted partner for investors. He understands that investors are not just looking for financial returns—they want to be part of a business that makes a positive impact. Flom's focus on sustainability, social responsibility, and long-term value creation aligns perfectly with the goals of modern, socially conscious investors. His ability to build strong, lasting relationships with stakeholders is a testament to his integrity and genuine care for the people around him.
Conclusion: A Legacy of Service, Innovation, and Compassion
Gary B Flom's career is a powerful example of how business success and social responsibility can go hand in hand. His achievements in the automotive, fintech, and mobility sectors are impressive, but what truly sets him apart is his commitment to making a positive impact on the world. Whether he is leading a company, supporting charitable causes, or inspiring his employees, Flom approaches everything he does with a sense of purpose and a desire to do good.
His philosophy of "Do Good, Have Good" is more than just a saying—it's a guiding principle that shapes every aspect of his life. From his military service to his business achievements and philanthropic work, Gary B Flomhas shown that true success is about more than financial gain. It's about creating a better world for everyone, and in that, he continues to lead by example.
Read more:
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/69253876/gary-b-flom-ksa#google_vignette
https://thuysan247.net/threads/gary-b-flom-a-business-leader-with -a-heart-for-humanity-and-social-responsibility.16671/
https://www.dbusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2019/09/2019_DB500.pdf
https://bfa.com/people/gary-flom
https://www.uni-muenster.de/Physik.TP/archive/Seminare/QFT/fragen_2006.html
https://ricecountymemorial.org/wp-content/uploads/RCVM_Directory_052317.pdf
If you want to stop arguing all the time, avoid these mistakes
The post Three Common Mistakes Couples Make During Conflict appeared first on The Gottman Institute.